(121) Movement selection in advance of action in the superior colliculus.   Glimcher PW and Sparks DL.   1992.   Nature, volume 355, pages 542-545.

(122) Visual receptive field properties of excitatory neurons in the substantia nigra.   Nagy A, Eordegh G, Norita M and Benedek G.   2005.   Neuroscience, volume 130, pages 513-518.

(123) Two visual systems.   Schneider GE.   1969.   Science, volume 163, pages 895-902.

(124) Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices.   de Gelder B, Morris JS and Dolan RJ.   2005.   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, volume 102, pages 18682-18687.
     With reference to the content of an abstract reflecting its title and making sense, the researchers use "Unconscious" in the title and "unconscious" and "nonconscious" in the content of the abstract, without clarification.

(125) The human basis pontis: motor syndromes and topographic organization.   Schmahmann JD, Ko R and MacMore J.   2004.   Brain, volume 127, pages 1269-1291.
     With reference to the use of the present tense, the researchers clearly believe that their results generalise, in spite of the lack of an indices of test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability for the clinical signs, and without any consideration of dominance.

(126) Interactions between GABAergic and cholinergic processes in the nucleus pontis oralis: neuronal mechanisms controlling active (rapid eye movement) sleep and wakefulness.   Xi MC, Morales FR and Chase MH.   2004.   Journal of Neuroscience, volume 24, pages 10670-10678.
     With reference to the content of an article making sense, there was a saline control in the first experiment. There was a saline control in the second experiment given the results in Figure 6C, but in the text the researchers state: "In the second set of experiments, carbachol was injected first, and it was followed by an injection of muscimol (10mM) or carbachol followed by saline." What the researchers actually did, given the results in Figure 6C, was to give an injection of carbachol followed by either muscimol or saline. There was no saline control in the third experiment, so that scopolamine was followed by bicucciline or by carbachol, but not by saline, and the researchers' description is again confusing, relative to their results in Figure 9, for which see the article.

(127) The effects of tonic locus ceruleus output on sensory-evoked responses of ventral posterior medial thalamic and barrel field cortical neurons in the awake rat.   Devilbiss DM and Waterhouse BD.   2004.   Journal of Neuroscience, volume 24, pages 10773- 10785.
     The researchers identified 191 individual neurones in six rats and then performed statistical tests that assumed the neurones were independent individuals.

(128) Locus ceruleus activation suppresses feedforward interneurons and reduces beta-gamma electroencephalogram frequencies while it enhances theta frequencies in rat dentate gyrus.   Brown RA, Walling SG, Milway JS and Harley CW.   2005.   Journal of Neuroscience, volume 25, pages 1985-1991.   
     With reference to consistent language, in the abstract the researchers refer to "feedforward neurons", then to "feedback interneurons" and then to "feedforward inhibitory interneuron activity". In the article, the researchers refer to "neurons" and "units" in the same paragraph, and to "cells" in Figure 4 which accompanies that paragraph. Perhaps relatedly, in the Materials and Methods of the article, the researchers state that "Cells and glutamate ejection sites were not always located anatomically...".

(129) Differential effects of ascending neurons containing dopamine and noradrenaline in the control of spontaneous activity and of evoked responses in the rat prefrontal cortex.   Mantz J, Milla C, Glowinski J and Thierry AM.   1988.   Neuroscience, volume 27, pages 517-526.

(130) Noradrenaline and dopamine elevations in the rat prefrontal cortex in spatial working memory.   Rossetti ZL and Carboni S.   2005.   Journal of Neuroscience, volume 25, pages 2322-2329.
     The researchers use different language and different logic to describe the same procedure in the abstract and in the article. Two groups of rats, one trained and the other untrained, were kept in the waiting cage for a variable time before testing. This procedure is described in the abstract as evaluation of "...anticipatory responses to catecholamine efflux..." whereas in the article it is described as "a control for the effect of conditioning on PFC catecholamine levels...". But the untrained group was already a control for the effect of conditioning on PFC catecholamine levels.